Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php on line 5

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 546

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 547

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 548
US MI: Edu: Ann Arbor City Council Puts 120-Day Moratorium on - Rave.ca
Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
News (Media Awareness Project) - US MI: Edu: Ann Arbor City Council Puts 120-Day Moratorium on
Title:US MI: Edu: Ann Arbor City Council Puts 120-Day Moratorium on
Published On:2010-08-09
Source:Michigan Daily (U of MI, Edu)
Fetched On:2010-08-09 15:00:28
ANN ARBOR CITY COUNCIL PUTS 120-DAY MORATORIUM ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARIES

In their bi-weekly meeting last Thursday, Ann Arbor City Council
passed a 120-day moratorium on new medical marijuana dispensaries in
the city as a last-minute addition to the meeting's agenda.

The Michigan Medical Marijuana Act passed in 2008 does not mention
dispensaries, leaving municipalities across the state to grapple with
zoning and regulation issues. Ann Arbor is one of several cities,
including Holland and Ypsilanti, to place a moratorium on new
dispensaries in order to give the council time to fill the gap in the
state law.

City Attorney Stephen Postema opened the council's discussion by
explaining why the resolution was put forth.

"The dispensary issue that has come up is nowhere contemplated in the
state law," he said. "It's a problem for municipalities. That's what
they have to deal with. Whether it came as a moratorium or as a
directive of the council, it's entirely proper for the public health,
safety and welfare for the council to consider the issue.

"One of the concerns that ... the council will deal with is really
the aggregation and the consolidation of many, many shops or
dispensaries together," he added. "This really caused a big problem
in California."

Postema directed his comments at the meeting attendees, who were
visibly frustrated by the timing of the resolution, which had been
added to the agenda at 5 p.m. the previous night, leaving little time
for the public to review the item.

Dennis Hayes, a local lawyer who now deals almost exclusively with
medical marijuana issues, was the first of ten citizens to address
the council in opposition to the resolution. He also made clear his
suspicion of a hidden agenda.

"You all should know better than to do this stuff in secret," he said.

Some members of the council, including Sabra Briere (D Ward 1),
Margie Teall (D Ward 3) and Carsten Hohnke (D Ward 5), said they were
surprised by the last minute addition.

"Bringing this forward tonight, well actually last night, was a
surprise to many of us because by rights we should've seen it last
Friday. Our council rules say that as council members we should try
very hard to bring forward our resolutions by Friday of the week
before the council meeting occurs," Briere said.

Hohnke said he suggested the council postpone the resolution until
the following week. Briere supported his proposal, arguing that the
public deserved time to look it over.

After some discussion, the council decided that it would be best to
proceed with the resolution since it had already been brought to the
table and delaying it would only push the moratorium further down the road.

In an interview with The Michigan Daily, Council Member Mike Anglin
(D Ward 5) said the discussion on the issue lasted for about an hour
and a half, because it was the first time the council had addressed
medical marijuana policy in a public meeting. Throughout the
discussion, the council made a number of amendments to the resolution.

Council Member Christopher Taylor (D Ward 3) was the first to
introduce several amendments to make sure individual patients and
caregivers would still be allowed to grow and use marijuana as
allowed by the state law during the four-month moratorium.

"The proposal," he said, "does not seek to keep sick patients or
their caregiver from the medicine that they require and is their
right per state law."

With the original resolution calling for a six-month moratorium,
Council Member Sandi Smith (D Ward 1) proposed that the council
shorten the moratorium to 90 days, calling 180 days "punitive" and
unnecessary with the availability of models of regulation proposed by
citizens or already established in places like Traverse City.

The council compromised with 120 days at the suggestion of City
Administrator Roger Fraser.

One decision that the council debated at length was whether the
resolution should grandfather in pre-existing dispensaries, which
would allow them to remain open until the end of the four months, at
which point they too would be subject to the zoning regulations
decided on during the moratorium.

Charles Ream, a prominent advocate in the medical marijuana community
who is involved in the planning of a dispensary on Packard Road,
urged the council at the beginning of the meeting to vote against the
resolution, but at the very least allow current dispensaries to keep
their doors open.

Briere argued in favor of the grandfather clause for the sake of
patients in the community who already rely on dispensaries for their medicine.

Council Member Stephen Rapundalo (D Ward 2) was the sole voice in
opposition to the grandfather clause, saying all dispensaries should
close unless they can convince the council in a public hearing that
staying open would avoid economic harm to the city.

The council ultimately voted in favor of an amendment introduced by
Taylor, specifying that the resolution apply only to "the initiation
or expansion of" dispensaries on city property.

After the resolution passed, Ann Arbor Mayor John Hieftje expressed
his feelings on the resolution to the citizens in the room, saying he
thought a moratorium was appropriate and reasonable.

"It does seem to me given what we've heard from our neighborhoods, it
would not be a bad idea to step back, take a little time," he said.
"Don't change a thing from the way it is now, but take a little time
to decide how we will go forward."
Member Comments
No member comments available...