CALIFORNIA MUST KEEP DRUG COURTS IN PLACE

It is clear that in recent years, there was a lot wrong with the way that
California and the nation dealt with the misery of widespread drug abuse.
It became clear with the passage of Proposition 36 that many Californians
are aware that the emphasis on penal punishment was part of the problem of
drug abuse -- not the solution.

However, from all the factual evidence, it is also clear that the system of
drug courts in California has been a shining light in a dark-and-dreary
picture. The facts show that drug courts are effective and successful, and
we need more of them.

Experts in the field know that for many addicts a combination of the
carrot-and-the-stick/love-and-care approach -- combined with authority --
is the only way that positive change can occur.

If Proposition 36 is to succeed, drug courts, as an integral part of the
Proposition 36 strategy, should be greatly expanded -- not eliminated.

Although some proponents of Proposition 36 oppose drug courts, they lack
the knowledge and skill to implement and administer the policy and program
that can achieve their own goals.

They have made a powerful political statement. They should remain watchdogs
regarding goal achievement. But they must not usurp the role of social
scientists and therapists who agree with their objectives and who have the
relevant expertise and responsibility to do the work that obtains results.

The drug court is necessary as the glue that keeps the addict, who would
otherwise relapse repeatedly, attached to the program -- thus preventing a
tragic and expensive waste of human and economic resources. Many addicts
tell you this. Many recovering addicts admit this.

New York has embarked on exactly this approach by integrating the
Proposition 36 way and the drug court way into a powerful strategy for
maximum success.

Let us take a closer look at the New York model. Then let us rapidly
develop our own California model. California political leaders now have the
opportunity and duty to respond decisively to the voters by steering
Proposition 36 toward creative public policy.

Let them hear from you. We do not have the time or the money to waste.

Marlo D'Angeli, Stockton