ART IMITATES LIFE "Education, rehabilitation and prevention, that's not significant to these reporters. They want to see people in prison. They want to see the gory aspect of the drug problem." - -- U.S. Sen. Harry Reid's self-scripted line in the upcoming Michael Douglas movie "Traffic." Perhaps not all reporters, Sen. Reid. In fact, I think the majority of reporters wouldn't want any nonviolent drug offenders to go to prison. Most of us know the prison building boom could be eased significantly if drugs were not classified as crimes, especially not felony crimes, as they are here in Nevada. We'd be all for education, if it was realistic, honest and not taught by the gun-toting police officers of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program, which studies have shown has had little effect on preventing drug use. We'd be all for rehabilitation, if it wasn't presumed that every drug user is an addict in need of treatment. What about people who freely choose to use drugs and whose drug of choice isn't state-sanctioned alcohol or state-subsidized tobacco, but rather marijuana, cocaine, heroin or acid? Why should someone like that need "rehabilitation" any more than someone who likes to take a drink after work? And prevention, well, we'd be for that, too, if we didn't see the negative effects of prosecuting the drug war: Search and seizure violations, pretrial asset forfeitures, arbitrary traffic stops, rogue cops planting drugs as an excuse for a phony arrest or even, in the case of Los Angeles Rampart scandal, cops stealing drugs from dealers so the police themselves can sell them. All of those things are very significant to reporters, I'd say. At least to this one. But the "gory aspect of the drug problem" is not only found in the legitimate cases of people who got addicted, and who now cannot break the grip of their chosen escape. The gory aspect of the drug war is playing itself out now in places like Colombia, where the United States has sent advisers to interfere in that country's long-standing civil war, ostensibly to cut down on drug cultivation. President Clinton himself has declared that this will not turn into another Vietnam (it's all right now, Mr. President; you're too old to be drafted). But as Clinton himself should well realize, the chain of events that lead to Vietnams happen when we start down a road of military intervention with impossible goals. And ridding South America of drugs is an impossible goal. In the film "Traffic," in which Reid makes his cameo, Douglas stars as an Ohio judge nominated to be drug czar, one of the cabinet-level positions that government-cutting former President Ronald Reagan created that his successors haven't had the temerity to eliminate. (Clinton, to his credit, has cut funding for the office significantly, but appointed the unfortunate former Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who brought the same zeal to demonizing drug use as he did to prosecuting wars.) Reid's counterpoint in the scene with Douglas was reporter Jeff Podolsky, formerly of George Magazine, who said: "If a judge or a politician is willing to put a reefer in his mouth, I'll do a story on it." Ha! We get it, the drug-crusading politician who takes a toke the way Cuba-embargoing President John F. Kennedy was rumored to enjoy Cuban cigars. But that attitude misses the point: Stories on hypocritical politicians are as common as contraband drugs in prison. (A good side issue, by the way: how can we keep drugs off the streets of a free society when we can't keep them out of maximum security? Unless of course, we were to remove the modifier "free.") The real story would be finding a politician with the courage to stand up and say, "The drug war has failed, the government shouldn't have been telling us what we can or cannot ingest in the first place and the erosion of liberty is too great for this to endure another second. I'm introducing a bill that will end this tomorrow, and I urge all my colleagues who know what I'm saying is true to join me." If a real-life politician was willing to put those words in his mouth, I'd do a story on it. Any takers? Steve Sebelius is a Review-Journal political columnist. His column runs Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday.
No member comments available...
|