Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
michaeldino's Profile - Community Messages
Page: 1 .. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 73 Next »»
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 16, 2005 @ 3:14pm. Posted in The next James Bond.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
once you go black.. we don't want you back
just remember that...
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 16, 2005 @ 3:10pm. Posted in Emo quiz.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
wtf???
me???
Your Results:
Holy Shit Your Emo
Holy shit you actually are emo! Congratulations on not being a poser.


im so not emo its gross
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 16, 2005 @ 3:00pm. Posted in The next James Bond.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by LITTLE SARAH...

james bond should be a foxy black guy


you're gross
like really really gross
you can't use me on your passport anymore
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 15, 2005 @ 1:47pm. Posted in Nymph.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
sweet.. now that ian is out of the picture...
wanna be my friend?
PLEASE!!!
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 15, 2005 @ 1:45pm. Posted in ignore this thread.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
anyone want free computers from concordia?
im trying to figure out a way to steal them now
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 15, 2005 @ 1:43pm. Posted in Who's religious in here ?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by VIOLENCE INC....

God wouldn't live in the west island... thus you are not God.


burn ian... burn
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 15, 2005 @ 12:01am. Posted in things about me.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
SHE WASN'T MY COUSIN!!!
damn you Sarah for spreading rumours about me!!
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 15, 2005 @ 12:01am. Posted in Bunny ransom.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
id kill him... and cook him
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 14, 2005 @ 11:51pm. Posted in things about me.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by [SCREWHEAD]...

Hey, Dino, I fixed up your post for you ;)

Originally posted by Dinosaur...
THREE REASONS YOU'VE BROKEN UP WITH EXES:

1. Crazy
2. She didn't know what she wanted
3. Cousins


you bastard!!
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 14, 2005 @ 9:23pm. Posted in things about me.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
THREE NAMES YOU GO BY:

1. Dino
2. Mike
3. Dyke

THREE THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT YOURSELF:

1. Clever
2. Smart
3. Charismatic (when I wanna be)

THREE THINGS YOU HATE ABOUT YOURSELF:

1. My "large and in charge"-ness
2. My inability to achieve goals
3. My lack of self-respect

THREE PARTS OF YOUR HERITAGE:

1. Italian
2. Italian
3. Italian

THREE THINGS YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND:

1. Girls (not women)
2. German
3. Mechanics of Materials

THREE THINGS THAT ANNOY YOU:

1. Crazies
2. People who can't drive
3. People poking me when I'm studying

THREE THINGS THAT SCARE YOU:

1. Time
2. Heart Disease
3. My Dad

THREE OF YOUR EVERYDAY ESSENTIALS:

1. Studying
2. Corn Flakes
3. Silliness

THREE THINGS YOU ARE WEARING RIGHT NOW:

1. Pants
2. Sweet sweet new jacket
3. Boxer briefs

THREE THINGS ON MY DESK

1. My jacket
2. A can of 100% Apple juice
3. A mouse

THREE THINGS YOU SAY THE MOST:

1. Or what
2. I hate you
3. [ www.. ] How sweet!

THREE OF YOUR FAVORITE BANDS AT THE MOMENT:

1. The Killers
2. U2
3. Led Zeppelin

PEOPLE YOU SPEND THE MOST TIME WITH:

1. Peter
2. Anthony
3. Ian

THREE REASONS YOU'VE BROKEN UP WITH EXES:

1. Crazy
2. She didn't know what she wanted
3. Crazy

THREE THINGS YOU WOULD WANT IN A RELATIONSHIP:

1. Love

THREE THINGS ABOUT THE OPPOSITE SEX THAT APPEAL TO YOU:

1. A sexy ass
2. Brain
3. Quirks

THREE THINGS YOU CAN'T DO:

1. Be happy
2. Study
3. Follow rules

THREE OF YOUR FAVORITE HOBBIES:

1. Talking with friends
2. Putzing around
3. Programming

THREE THINGS YOU WANT REALLY BAD RIGHT NOW:

1. A girlfriend
2. A sexy body
3. To be finished Engineering

THREE CAREERS YOU'RE CONSIDERING:

1. Civil Engineer
2. Bar Owner
3. Contractor

THREE PLACES YOU WOULD GO ON VACATION:

1. Italy
2. Bora Bora
3. Australia

THREE THINGS YOU WANT TO DO BEFORE YOU DIE:

1. Raise my children
2. Skydive
3. Create the most comprehensive Engineering Problem Solving program ever
» michaeldino replied on Sun Feb 13, 2005 @ 1:51pm. Posted in Salad Fingers.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
wtf?
» michaeldino replied on Sun Feb 13, 2005 @ 1:46pm. Posted in Passwords.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
i do
» michaeldino replied on Sun Feb 13, 2005 @ 1:42pm. Posted in who still raves?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
i dont think i ever did
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 12, 2005 @ 9:29pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
whos that?
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 12, 2005 @ 9:26pm. Posted in Hottest Raver on rave.ca.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
let's see yours if you love them so much
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 12, 2005 @ 11:50am. Posted in Who's religious in here ?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by CINDERELLA SOUL...

Originally posted by DJneoform...

You can very much explain morals, good/bad, right/wrong with science, i dunno why you'd think otherwise..
Don't kill: Why? [...]
Don't Steal: Why? [...]
Don't Rape.. don't lie..[...]
.



Your reasoning above is, I think, philosophical reasoning. The natural sciences (physics, chemistry,) are generally purely physical sciences and do not generally touch on morailty.

Neoform, your reasoning reminds me of Immanuel Kant ( well-reputed philosopher): philisophical.

I


Immanuel Kant was not very scientific. He was actually a very religious man. And most of his philosophy was based on his trying to relate religious beliefs and moral philosophy. He wanted to show how, while not properly explained in the Bible, the ideals in it were good on a logical, philosophical way. He never really let up on his uber-religiousness, but if you read his stuff it is very evident that he is.
I would compare him to Thomas Aquinas, another religious man who tried to tie religion to philosophy.
» michaeldino replied on Fri Feb 11, 2005 @ 2:36pm. Posted in Bye Bye Loki.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

robbing Massive Greedy Labels and Overpaid Execs? I've got no problem with that.


Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

You can very much explain morals, good/bad, right/wrong with science, i dunno why you'd think otherwise..

Don't kill: Why? Because we as a society would go to shit if we killed everyone.

Don't Steal: Why? Because taking other people's things would lead to killing (very simplistic view, but you get the idea).

Don't Rape.. don't lie.. every moral rule you've got in your head can be logically reasoned.. and if it can't, well you'd better start thinking about why you're living by that rule.

Science, the "observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena" absolutely applies to how we as humans come to our own, or group conclusions as to what is right and wrong.

Anybody who simply says "that's wrong.. just because" IS WRONG, sorry to say it, but without a reason for believing something.. you have no reason to be believing it.
» michaeldino replied on Fri Feb 11, 2005 @ 2:34pm. Posted in Who's religious in here ?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

You can very much explain morals, good/bad, right/wrong with science, i dunno why you'd think otherwise..
Don't kill: Why? [...]
Don't Steal: Why? [...]
Don't Rape.. don't lie..[...]
Science, the "observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena" absolutely applies to how we as humans come to our own, or group conclusions as to what is right and wrong.


I didn't see one use of science to prove those things right or wrong, or moral or immoral.
There is no scientific evidence to show that killing is wrong. I would actually say there is more scientific evidence saying that killing is right. Overpopulation for one. For all those science "nuts" out there that believe in Survival of the Fittest, why doesn't that apply to humans? Science says it should. Why do we try to save that kid that was born with no arms or legs? We shouldn't!
You don't bring many good points to the table there Ian. You're just saying that religion
is wrong.. just because

Don't confuse logic and science. Logic applies very much to science, but just as every square is a rectangle, not every rectangle is a square. Science doesn't apply well to logic.
» michaeldino replied on Thu Feb 10, 2005 @ 2:54pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by DOCTOR KARBUL...

AHAHAHAHAH GOLD DINO!!!!! GOLD!!! *runs like a retard to slap you hand, but misses...and drouls...*(


yay! acceptance! approval!
hurrah!!
» michaeldino replied on Thu Feb 10, 2005 @ 2:35pm. Posted in Who's religious in here ?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by RANDOMJUNKIE...
because science is full contradictions.

well i wouldn't say taht... there are many more contradictions in religion than science
» michaeldino replied on Thu Feb 10, 2005 @ 12:50pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by MISS CARO...

gen is hot shit. nice pics.


yeah.. if we put you in a paper bag on someone's front porch... we wouldn't have to light it on fire... you'd do it by yourself...
GET IT?? CUZ YOU"RE HOT SHIT!!!
BAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!
» michaeldino replied on Thu Feb 10, 2005 @ 12:46pm. Posted in Who's religious in here ?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

The difference being those scientists are much more intelligent people than those priests and clerics.


ummm... are you sure?
i have one name for you
Father Boutilier.. Loyola
that man was by far the smartedt man i have ever known... he knew it all
from physics to philophy to mythology

many priests/clerics/what-have-yous are very intelligent and scientific...
many of them turn to faith when they can't find any more meaning through science
yeah its all well and good to understand how everything works, but why?
» michaeldino replied on Thu Feb 10, 2005 @ 1:51am. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by -GEN-...

I never shower.


thats hot
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 9, 2005 @ 6:14pm. Posted in Playstation 3... Fastest gun in the West.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Sony PlayStation 3
IBM, Sony, and Toshiba give Cell processor details
The Cell processor manufactured with a 90nm process will have 234 million transistors and a prototype die size of 221mm square.
By James Yu
Posted Monday, February 7th 2005

The next-generation Cell processor will consist of a single 64-bit Power processing core with eight synergistic processing units. Top engineers from IBM, Sony, and Toshiba made the disclosure at a press conference held at the opening of the International Solid-State Circuits Conference in San Francisco. The Cell triumvirate revealed last November that the processor would have a multicore architecture, but engineers did not reveal how many processing cores each Cell chip would have.


[ ] Cell processor will power
Sony's next-generation
PlayStation 3 console.

The Cell processor will be at the core of Sony's soon-to-be-announced PlayStation 3 console system, and the chip will also find its way into several different applications that range from workstations to television sets.

The Cell processor will offer a tremendous amount of parallelism with its eight synergistic processing cores working in conjunction with the single Power control processor. SCEI vice president of microprocessor development Masakazu Suzuoki adds that the first Cell implementation only has eight synergistic cores, but the architecture is flexible enough to allow for additional cores. Current desktop processors, such as the Intel Pentium 4 and the AMD Athlon 64, only have a single processing core, but both companies plan to release dual-core desktop processors later this year.

The Cell processor manufactured with a 90nm process will have 234 million transistors and a prototype die size of 221mm square. The Intel Pentium 4 "Prescott" processor, by contrast, also uses the 90nm process, but it only has 125 million transistors and a 122mm square die size. Much of the Cell real estate is taken up by the multiple synergistic cores and a sizable amount of on-chip memory. The Cell has 512KB of L2 cache, and each synergistic processing unit has 256KB of cache memory.

The Cell uses Rambus XDR and FlexIO technology to move data in and out of the chip at speeds approaching 100 gigabytes per second. The XDR memory interface can push 30 gigabytes per second at 3.2GHz, and the FlexIO bus running at 6.4GHz has a maximum throughput of 72 gigabytes per second.

Even with the huge transistor count and large die size, the Cell development team has achieved clock speeds greater than 4GHz in internal testing. According to Jim Kahle, IBM Fellow and director of technology for the Design Center for Cell Technology, "We're not just going after the frequency race. We've pushed both frequency and parallelism at the same time." Even though the design group has demonstrated speeds greater than 4GHz, Kahle adds that it's ultimately up to the manufacturer to determine final clock speed, since the most-efficient clock speed, with regard to power consumption, won't be the maximum operating speed.

The Cell's multiple cores open up a variety of programming models in terms of thread assignment and resource management. The Power processor unit is capable of processing two threads, and each synergistic processor can handle a single thread each--for a total of 10 total concurrent threads--which introduces a new problem of determining how to best use all the processor resources.

According to Kahle, "We had a significant number of software engineers working on programming models for the Cell architecture. ... There are a number of different ways to approach the parallelism available in this chip, and we're going to make those available to people." The Cell team will develop the basic software models and then share the software design process with open-source communities to promote future development.

IBM will produce the processor using a 90nm manufacturing process in East Fishkill, New York, and Sony will manufacture the chip at its Nagasaki, Japan, fabrication plant using an advanced 65nm process.


Article courtesy of: [ ] GameSpot
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 9, 2005 @ 6:01pm. Posted in Who's the most annoying?.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
noice!
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 9, 2005 @ 5:27pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
i agree with the hotness of yas... but how do those pictures in any way accentuate that fact?
im at a loss
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 9, 2005 @ 12:05pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
monday maybe?
could have been last week

i see you all the time! you're just always really far away and/or i dont think you would recognize me

nextt ime ill bodycheck you so you know its me
» michaeldino replied on Wed Feb 9, 2005 @ 11:41am. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
and i show my love 'ron by walking past her on the street and bumping her with my schoolbag... in front of the faubourg
» michaeldino replied on Tue Feb 8, 2005 @ 10:19pm. Posted in once again, Personality Quiz.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Wackiness: 46/100
Rationality: 46/100
Constructiveness: 76/100
Leadership: 66/100





You are a SECL--Sober Emotional Constructive Leader. This makes you a Politician.

You cut deals, you change minds, you make things happen. You would prefer to be liked than respected, but generally people react to you with both. You are very sensitive to criticism, since your entire business is making people happy.

At times your commitment to the happiness of other people can cut into the happiness of you and your loved ones. This is very demanding on those close to you, who may feel neglected. Slowly, you will learn to set your own agenda--including time to yourself.

You are gregarious, friendly, charming and charismatic. You like animals, sports, and beautiful cars. You wear understated gold jewelry and have secret bad habits, like chewing your fingers and fidgeting.

You are very difficult to dislike.

Of the 92890 people who have taken this quiz since tracking began (8/17/2004), 7.4 % are this type.
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 7, 2005 @ 9:08pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
oh baby!
but wrong box....
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 7, 2005 @ 7:19pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
i wanna be in that box
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 7, 2005 @ 7:09pm. Posted in Commando.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
im going commando right now
there's some slutty girls at concordia...
» michaeldino replied on Mon Feb 7, 2005 @ 7:04pm. Posted in Commando.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
HOOO YEAH!!
» michaeldino replied on Sun Feb 6, 2005 @ 2:57pm. Posted in snap poll.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
then he sticks his penis in you
» michaeldino replied on Sun Feb 6, 2005 @ 10:45am. Posted in Suck my balls.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
HE HAS NO PENIS!!!

the onlu way for spongebob to pack fudge would be to drop him from really really high so he could pick up enough speed and fall into a an unpacked fudge package...
thats teh ONLY way
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 5, 2005 @ 6:07pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
AWWWW thanks!!
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 5, 2005 @ 4:56pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
sometimes... only when we're drunk... or breathing
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 5, 2005 @ 2:29pm. Posted in The Picture Thread....
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
Originally posted by MISS CARO...
you girls are awesome.... to the max

na-uh! ian is.. it says so right above his avatar
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 5, 2005 @ 10:00am. Posted in Nudity Vs. Violence.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
because nobody likes you
» michaeldino replied on Sat Feb 5, 2005 @ 9:59am. Posted in me + mini.
michaeldino
Coolness: 69695
ok... you guys look exactly like you do now...
there's really no difference at all...
its not mini yous... youre the same size
michaeldino's Profile - Community Messages