The Great K Debate...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Zz.ee.vV replied on Mon Aug 22, 2005 @ 1:31am |
Last night at the booty party, I was once again reassured in suckage of K.
You guys do what you wanna do, but I'm keeping my nasal virginity. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star replied on Mon Aug 22, 2005 @ 3:19am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PoiSoNeD_CaNdY replied on Mon Aug 22, 2005 @ 3:14pm |
Originally posted by HEATHER PIE HOLE...
with injecting K, not many people have time to put the needle in a safe place before they get holed. tiny winy bit dangerous when someone accidently steps on one! oi! that is true if u inject in your veins...u might even k-hole before you take the needle out but you can inject in your muscle and you won't k-hole for about 8-10 minutes...thats the way to go |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Mon Aug 22, 2005 @ 6:02pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PaT_ replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 2:25pm |
whats with bumpin threads back uh? shits wack. 3years style.
Originally posted by [SCREWHEAD]...
SAVE DA NITTLE KITTIES!!! I wanna get a ranch and live there with all the nittle kitties I'll save from MEAN PEOPLE and I think I'll call it the nittle kitty ranch because they're gonna be TONS of nittle kitties running around and being cute. yeah. dude thats major! |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 5:12pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Zomb-o-Tron replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 6:10pm |
K stands for ketamin? Isnt a drug used to kill the remaining cats in pet shops that nobody wants....thats what i heard and it stopped me from trying. And if its more addictive then coke then i surely dont wanna try.
Is it cheap? |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PaT_ replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 6:34pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 6:35pm |
Originally posted by PAT...
whats with bumpin threads back uh? shits wack. 3years style. Originally posted by [Screwhead]...
SAVE DA NITTLE KITTIES!!! I wanna get a ranch and live there with all the nittle kitties I'll save from MEAN PEOPLE and I think I'll call it the nittle kitty ranch because they're gonna be TONS of nittle kitties running around and being cute. yeah. dude thats major! *** Originally posted by [Screwhead]...
Wow. *re-reads old posts* I was on way too many fucking drugs. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Fri Aug 26, 2005 @ 6:37pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 5:34pm |
some dumb ass in this thread said K is a designer drug. K is an animal tranquiliser. Man you people are fucking stupid. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 8:06pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 8:24pm |
no
a designer drug is a term used to describe pressed pills with labellings that are cut with different elements to give an expected result. The use of labels and marketing with these pills is another important element of the term designer drug.The E pills you buy at raves are designer drugs. Pure MDMA is not. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 9:19pm |
no
Your partially right. Designer drugs are cut with different chemicals to evade certain drug laws, not necessarily to give expected results. And term was coined for MDMA... among others. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 10:08pm |
i hope your kidding. Cutting coke with baking soda won't make it any less illegal. You are confusing chemicals with the broader group that the term designer drug encompasses. MDMA is not a designer drug. MDMA sold in a pretty pill with a pretty label is. It has less to do with the chemical and more to do with the packaging and the marketing. Designer drugs are cut with different elements because most designer drugs come in pill form and making a pressed pill requires different agents to make the pill stick together. And the other reason being that it is cheaper and the last reason being , it will provide a new sensation. A designer drug makes reference to drug manufacturers using new recepies to provide new sensations.
anyways this is all semantics but the important thing is that you guys are all wrong . |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 10:12pm |
It is all sematics. But the important thing is that I read... and that your arrogant. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 10:25pm |
then show me a source. To suggest that drug manufactures cut their drugs to evade drug laws is absolutely rediculous. Pure cocaine is the same as cocaine cut with a lower class drug. Getting busted with 20 kg of pure cocaine is the same as being busted with 20 kg of dirty cocaine. I can't think of one logical reason to why this would even be a consideration. They cut drugs because it is cheaper , provides a new sensation , or is an integral part of the drug medium ie pressed pill.
If by reading you mean reading the morons on this webpage , i think you should seek out new sources. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:11pm |
Err...
1 : a synthetic version of a controlled substance (as heroin) that is produced with a slightly altered molecular structure to avoid classification as an illicit drug 2 : a synthetic drug created (as by genetic engineering) to treat a particular medical condition especially by producing a specific effect on the body's biochemistry Designer drug n : a psychoactive drug deliberately synthesized to avoid anti-drug laws; mimics the effects of a banned drug; law was revised in 1986 to ban designer drugs ...umm: Designer drug is a term to used to describe psychoactive drugs which are created (or marketed, if they had already existed) to get around existing drug laws by modifying their molecular structures to varying degrees. The term originated with law enforcement, but has gained widespread use. The term was originally coined in the 1980s to refer to various heroin like synthetic substances, mostly based on the fentanyl molecule. The term gained widespread popularity when MDMA (aka ecstasy) experienced a popularity boom in the mid 1980s. In the United States, the Controlled Substances Act was amended with the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement of 1986 which attempted to ban designer drugs pre-emptively by making it illegal to manufacture, sell, or possess chemicals which were substantially similar in chemistry and pharmacology to Schedule I or Schedule II drugs. [ en.wikipedia.org ] [ www.google.ca ] [ dictionary.reference.com ] ... so yeah, I was kidding. Haha. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:26pm |
oh please those defintions are about as current as Macgyver tv series. Not to mention inaccurate in todays setting. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:33pm |
The Great K Debate...
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |