Man Says Pie Is Poison - Then Eats Pie
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mindset replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 7:15pm |
`
` 1. A MAN ARGUES PASSIONATELY THAT YOU SHOULD NOT EAT THE PIE ON THE ROUND TABLE BECAUSE IT HAS A DEADLY POISON 2. YOU THEN SEE THE SAME MAN EATING THE PIE WOULD YOU THEN CONSIDER THE PIE: A) PROVEN SAFE NOW SAFE TO EAT B) STILL POSSIBLY TOXIC |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 7:32pm |
How round is the table? Is it oak? How many chairs are around said table? Also, what is said person wearing? Has said man left the room for any reason, or possibly ingested anything while in your company that may be used to neutralise poison? Also, how long have you been around said man? Could he possibly have taken some form of anti-poison before telling you to trick you into eating the pie that was actually poisoned? And what if it was a trick like in that godfather movie: 2 chemicals that are fine together but combined they prove fatal, so he eats pie, you eat pie, your both fine, but then he gives you a glass of milk with the second part of the poison in it?
What if, what if. Am I neoforming yet? Oh, sorry, I'm ben-ing. Ben-ing: Adjective - To over-analyze a sentence to the point of absurdity while never making any clear points as to the nature of the original statement or paragraph. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 7:35pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Unknown User replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 7:44pm |
fred, everything he says makes sense.
i asked him this weekend if the shit he posted made sense, it does. just look up the words on-line. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 7:59pm |
I'm certain that they are all real words. I'm certain they're all used properly. But it still doesn't change the fact that all he does is analyze parts of what is said and disects it in a message while COMPLETELY dodging the question or posting something that's only relation to the original statement is the reference to the original text in his analysis.
For one, lots of people have asked already, let's see what he does: WHY THE FUCK DID YOU PUNCH NEOFORM? *waits for the dictionary defenition of "punch" and "why" since those are the key words in this question that he will once again not answer* |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 8:24pm |
i found out.
apparently he gave me the option to 'stop it', and i said no. which OBVIOUSLY means he HAD to punch me. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 8:25pm |
Damnit, don't ruin this for me. I've been DYING to find out what "Why" and "punch" really mean! Like, their origins and use throughout time. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 8:25pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Feb 4, 2003 @ 10:40pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mindset replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 12:50am |
why are you all so socially inept.
u have IMs, dont u. if u want to ask me a question that is truly for an answer FROM ME and not some kind of pussy-bullying, then message me. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:05am |
*notes that he still hasn't answered*
I think this answer deserves a public posting, just so we should know what your guidelines are for what's acceptable to say to you or not so that all of the ravewave people can avoid the big wannabe thug punching them because his poor little ego was hurt. It would be a real shame if anyone else got hurt because someone doesn't know what acceptable behavior is. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:08am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:09am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mindset replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 2:04am |
neoform made it EXCEEDINGLY clear that it was his right to arbitrarily debase me at any rate and in any way he chose.
that is simply not the case. you dont have the right to constantly demean someone who makes a clear and concise effort to achieve resolution. over the phone, i literally asked if there was ANYthing i could do resolve this, to which he replied "No.... ADDICT!" it was mindboggling. i tried and tried - but you can only push a man so far. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 2:09am |
you're right, so when someone insults you, you punch them. GREAT FUCKING REASON!
next time someone calls me stupid, that fucker's getting it between the eyes |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mindset replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 2:24am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 2:26am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Agent_Yogurt replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 10:53am |
so ian, you are telling me that ben said lets stop this and you said no?
i thought you were gonna be the better person. i guess not. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 11:17am |
it really doesn't matter what i did, right megan? i mean if i got punched in the face for no reason you'll be there to agree with whomever disagrees with me..
if i said humans need oxygen to live, you'd jump out and say we don't. if i said drinking lysol is bad for you, you'd prolly grab a bottle and prove me wrong. i'm actually getting used to your un thought out pre programmed responces. though it's nice to see that you approve of violence megan.. maybe i should expect you to assualt me next time you see me.. ? |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» daFTWin replied on Wed Feb 5, 2003 @ 11:21am |
Man Says Pie Is Poison - Then Eats Pie
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |