Art Channel
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» BOBDYLAN replied on Wed May 12, 2004 @ 7:39pm |
This is the art channel.
Post images of paint, sculpts, photos or something that is artistic for you, and tell us a little why you like it or not.[Cause not liking a piece of art is also a reaction that some artist covet with enthousiasm towards the public (I'm thinking of Marcel Duchamps )], must be made by humans hands. This painting of Dali is quite something. Is not the technique that impress me, but the ideas behind the scene. When I look at it, at first I see martyr, misery, desolation. But then, with another semiotic level of perception I see hope, I see passion and freedom. Dali is fuck-top. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Wed May 12, 2004 @ 7:47pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» BOBDYLAN replied on Wed May 12, 2004 @ 7:57pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Wed May 12, 2004 @ 8:04pm |
i dunno, i have to admit i was blown away when i saw a real one at the met. it was so small and i have to admire his talent but the content is garbage. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Wed May 12, 2004 @ 11:39pm |
yeh, went to the dali museum in florida...
didnt apperciate it as much as i should have though :O hes fucked up.. Lol in the good way |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 1:06am |
i think he actually he sees things with more clarity than most, though he portrays these visions in this amniotic concoction that has its roots in an artistic and politcal movement that was rebelling against an artistic norm. but that is art, technically, from a certain age onwards, it all becomes rebellious and an abstraction of the school of thought previously established.
i like dali, and i disgree with sarah when she says the content is crap. my feelings towards this piece draw out something of an emotional catharsis, to me it says quite literally, enlightenment. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ontheroadagain replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 4:27am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 9:04am |
Originally posted by ELIXIRELEVEN....
i think he actually he sees things with more clarity than most, though he portrays these visions in this amniotic concoction that has its roots in an artistic and politcal movement that was rebelling against an artistic norm. but that is art, technically, from a certain age onwards, it all becomes rebellious and an abstraction of the school of thought previously established. i like dali, and i disgree with sarah when she says the content is crap. my feelings towards this piece draw out something of an emotional catharsis, to me it says quite literally, enlightenment. please- everyone was "rebelling" at that time. they'd been "rebelling" for years, he wasn't some big shit instagtor or anything. i dunno- imagination paintings are useless to me. i like seeing life through the eyes of someone. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 10:23am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 12:20pm |
Originally posted by ELIXIRELEVEN
...imagination paintings are useless to me. i like seeing life through the eyes of someone. that presents something of a contradiction, wouldn't you say that all art is representative of the vision of the artist, modified by that individual's perception? but that isnt a solid excuse to define an artistic message as crap, if you can't see the artist's perception yourself. its ok to not understand something, but it takes a lot more character to say 'i dont get this' rather than shuffle it off as garbage. pish posh heironymus bosch. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 12:24pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» BOBDYLAN replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 7:20pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 8:10pm |
Originally posted by ELIXIRELEVEN....
Originally posted by elixireleven
...imagination paintings are useless to me. i like seeing life through the eyes of someone. that presents something of a contradiction, wouldn't you say that all art is representative of the vision of the artist, modified by that individual's perception? but that isnt a solid excuse to define an artistic message as crap, if you can't see the artist's perception yourself. its ok to not understand something, but it takes a lot more character to say 'i dont get this' rather than shuffle it off as garbage. pish posh heironymus bosch. I think it's crap. it's not that i don't see it- no one can see it- and if you do see lions flying around then you might have a problem. i do get it, and i just don't like it. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 8:16pm |
and yeah- i think bosch was cool coz he was one of the first first guys to do that. i can't find a picture of the garden of earthly delight, but that's my favorite of his paintings. i mean if you're gonna talk about admiring someone for doing somethign different, he's a good example. not dali. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Thu May 13, 2004 @ 10:00pm |
you totally missed my point. completely and utterly.
what lions? en-light-en-ment. not, en-lion-ment. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Fri May 14, 2004 @ 9:31am |
i didn't miss you point. i feel like you've only seen one of his paintings if you really have no idea what i'm talking about. it's kind of sad really. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Fri May 14, 2004 @ 12:33pm |
hardly. you're attempting to reiterate points I've previously made and totally ignored others. i think selective reading is kind of sad, really. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Fri May 14, 2004 @ 12:44pm |
How can you even utter the words "dali is crap"
and what does flying lions have to do with anything...so on that definition most abstract is crap, cos when im walking down the street i dont see random splatters or lines of color. Ever seen the riopelle exhibit... all abstract on huge canvas...fucking gorgeous work. just because the meaning of work cannot be grasped doesn't make it shit. Last time i checked i didn't make art for other people to understand, i made art formyself and for my own expression. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Fri May 14, 2004 @ 12:45pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Fri May 14, 2004 @ 12:53pm |
[ www.ibiblio.org ] this is by hokusai (the great wave of of kanagawa, sp?), my choice of the day. its a relatively well known piece when referring to japanese print art. it actually inspired the decor to my room last summer, when i went on a made hunt for japanese prints to plaster my walls. |
Art Channel
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |